The Cloning War Moral Or Immoral Essays - Cloning, Genetics

The Cloning War: Moral Or Immoral? The Cloning War: Moral or Immoral? Outside the lab where the cloning had actually taken place, most of us thought it could never happen. Oh we would say that perhaps at some point in the distant future, cloning might become feasible through the use of sophisticated biotechnologies far beyond those available to us now. But what we really believed, deep in our hearts, was that this was one biological feat we could never master. -Dr. Lee M. Silver, 1997 With every revolution, there must be conflict. When the great thinkers of the past decided the earth was round, or that the planets revolved around the sun, their revolution caused excommunication. When Americans rebelled against the mother country, their revolution caused a war. However, if not for the great thinkers, the revolutionists, and the science explorers, everyone would be sailing off the edge of the planet, believing to be scientific fact that Earth was the center of the universe, and America would be under steady oppression from Europe. On February 23, 1997, Doctor Ian Wilmut successfully cloned the world's first mammal, giving the world a harsh wake-up call to the state of its technology. The implications of an effective somatic cell nuclear transfer in mammals are tremendous. The use of cloning for research purposes could yield fixes for aging and heart problems; new organs for patients in need of transplants; increased reliability of plastic, reconstructive, and cosmetic surgery; the extinction of Down's syndrome and Tay-Sachs disease; and the cure for cancer (Human). The applications of the research of cell development are already witnessed in the invention of fabricated skin, cartilage, bone, and ligament and tendons. In fact, cloning is only a result of many years of research. In 1965, Dr. Marshall R. Urist of the University of California discovered that powdered bone, when combined with the isolated bone morphogenetic proteins and DNA sequences, would create new bone when placed in a bone fracture (?Tissue?, 47). However, fears of this new procedure are certainly well justified. A cloned child, for instance, would lose all sense of individuality, and the potential harm (which first must be downsized to an acceptable degree before full production could commence), at this point, greatly outweighs the beneficial yields (United, 66,65). Plus, given the option to choose features in a prospective clone child, or ?designer child?, procreating would be more feasibly compared with car shopping than reproduction (Silver, 227). These factors contribute to the controversial issue of morality. A broad subject filled with gray matter, the decision of whether or not something is moral is spawned from religious thought, ethical concerns, and the comparison of the gains of a procedure to the costs. Facts must be gathered from the word of God, from logical reasoning, and from scientific inquiry. When all the data is gathered, the question of morality is answered with a definitively negative response. Cloning is a procedure that is definitely not moral due to its possible harm to child and parents; its religious implications; and its unfavorable ratio of harm to good. It is important to realize that the process of cloning that produced Dolly the sheep is a brand-new science that has only been successfully performed a small number of times. The actual process involves removing the nucleus of an ovum and replacing it with an epithelial cell, or a cell with the basic number of chromosomes doubled (?Cloning?, 677). However, this nuclear transfer has the potential for serious physical and psychological harms to all involved in the procedure, and when such harms exist, rarely are any procedures performed on humans without extensive animal research. In all actuality, even if there were a convincing reason to perform this procedure on human beings, it would have to fall under one strict criteria that morals and medical ethics alike consider to be impenetrable: the slogan ?to first do no harm? (United, 65). It should be noted that the somatic cell nuclear transfer that produced Dolly was successful in only one out of 277 attempts. If the same procedure was endeavored in humans, the requirements could be devastating to the potential mother. To start, the doctor would have to provide much hormonal manipulation in order to allow the procedure

Symbolic Interaction Theory Sample Essay

Symbolic Interaction Theory Sample EssayThe symbolic interaction theory sample essay will review the theory and analyze some of the examples from literature to which it is relevant. It contains short chapters on composition, level of argumentation, line length, argument elaboration, arguments that use humor, and reading aloud.The symbolic interaction theory can be used in most college writing courses. However, the process of developing this kind of essay is a bit more involved than simply reading one paragraph after another. This is because it involves the use of familiar sources in a new and creative way.One of the advantages of this type of writing is that you are able to effectively communicate ideas with a new angle. Since the idea is only partially or sometimes not at all explored, you may not see your own idea in its entirety.Another advantage is that it is in a conversational style. The paragraphs can still flow with a conversational tone. This makes the essay easier to read.Y our objective is to present a clear and concise idea, rather than trying to describe how much you wrote and where you were when you wrote it. The person doing the reviewing will be able to read your essay and have a sense of how you wrote it. There is also no way for a reader to compare what they've read and your paragraph, since the essay is simple and in a conversational tone.It is important to be aware of the social context in which you are writing the essay. A lot of the work you need to do is anticipating what you might be asked and how you will answer it. You should not give too much information at the beginning or end of the essay, since this will allow a reviewer to decide if your essay is interesting enough to read the rest of it.The idea is to build up a momentum of information, which gives a reviewer an opportunity to delve into the intricacies of your ideas and then ask the subtler points. Most important, you must make sure that you have nothing that you forgot. If you h ave forgotten something important, you need to get it in writing before you submit your essay.The symbolic interaction theory sample essay can be challenging, but the result is worth the effort. You will be able to expand your writing skills, and have more confidence in your ability to write to a crowd.